Wikipedian explained why Zelensky had won: различия между версиями
[досмотренная версия] | [досмотренная версия] |
Содержимое удалено Содержимое добавлено
Нет описания правки |
Нет описания правки |
||
Строка 35:
The audience’s reaction to the presentation was very different. As the Tyumen [[:en:w:Online newspaper|online newspaper]] «Vsluh.ru» [http://www.vsluh.ru/news/society/340163 reported] about the lecture on April, 4, some listeners expressed the view that usage of archetypes is impossible. At the same time, the editor-in-chief of the «[[:en:w:Moskovskij Komsomolets|Moskovskij Komsomolets in Tyumen]]» newspaper Vyacheslav Devyatkov [https://tumen.mk.ru/social/2019/04/17/v-tochke-kipeniya-obsudili-vliyanie-na-razvitie-sociuma-tekh-ili-inykh-psikhotipov.html was] more supportive of the speaker:
{{цитата|In fact, the question is open. But the relationship of history and psychology probably still exists. According to [[:en:w:Psychologist|psychologists]], everyday mistakes,
Private [[:en:w:Trader (finance)|trader]] Alexander Pytiev, who was present at the presentation in Moscow, told our [[w:Correspondent|correspondent]] that he
{{цитата|«…is always interested in theories that work on personal level, a level of an individual, and also have claims to bring to a level of analytical continuations. Firstly, to smaller organized groups, and later to more and more large communities. I liked the presentation, it was interestingly designed. The format of the discussion wasn’t very successful, but it seems to become better in future.}}
|